Friday, September 16, 2016

VALUES A Primer for Politicians



“Vote for my candidate because he shares your values.”  How often have you heard that during the recent election campaign? “Values”, a word tossed about with a demeaning casualness in today’s public discourse but rarely defined, leaving the term open to a variety of interpretations.  I suspect most of the time it is code word used to reach the base audience of the speaker or writer, so there is no reason to clarify or define what these values are. In today’s cultural cauldron when a politician talks of “values” he is most likely referring to one, or all, of the following:  homosexuality, gay marriage, and abortion. By definition, any position on these issues can be held in high value, and it is easy to understand why they have become so contentious.

My concern is not with these issues, but that they have come to be the public definition of our cultural and social values, at the expense of others.  There are several that I consider far more important than one’s beliefs about sexuality and abortion. There are values that reflect our behavior, attitude, and treatment of others, values that determine the character of our society. 

HONESTY & INTEGRITY

I see this as the bedrock of all of the others.  The concept of honesty, as it applies to our interactions with others, is not a difficult one to understand. Honesty also means not misrepresenting facts or purposely omitting facts that do not support your position.  An even more important aspect of honesty is being honest with our selves.  If we cannot do this, then we cannot be honest with others.   Self-deception is dangerously easy, but recognizing and acknowledging it is difficult.

Honesty also means not misrepresenting yourself, pretending to be something else for purposes of deception and/or personal gain.

CIVILITY

Without civility we degrade into an antagonistic, bombastic society, awash with name-calling and inflammatory rhetoric, which effectively precludes thoughtful dialog as well as mutual respect.  It is easy to be polite and courteous to those we like and who share our sentiment.  The challenge is to extend that same treatment to those with whom we disagree.




THOUGHTFULNESS

Imagine how different our national politics would be if thoughtfulness was valued. Thoughtfulness should be at the top of the list of values to be cultivated and nurtured.  It is a rare occasion that does not allow us time to think before we speak or act.  Even more important is how we formulate our opinions and ideas, and how we respond to those that differ from our own.  Thoughtfulness can prevent inflammatory and emotional exchanges with others.  It gives us pause to reflect on the nature and validity of opinions and ideas we confront, our own, and those of others. It provides the time and space needed to develop respect for conflicting beliefs, and to critically examine our own.

RESPECT – UNDERSTANDING – TOLERANCE

Politically and culturally our society has become increasingly divisive, leading to antagonistic and inflammatory dialog on many issues.  My concern is that some people come to see this as the only way – or an accepted way – to deal with conflict and disagreements.  But when we take the time to quietly exchange ideas and beliefs we usually find that what we have in common is far more than what we disagree on.  We need to learn to respect those who disagree with us, by leaning heavily on our shared commonality.

This can be accomplished by developing listening skills, to hear what is being said, without immediately responding defensively and reiterating our own feelings and ideas.  The person disagreeing with you probably feels as deeply and passionately about his or her position or belief as you do.

I am not proposing that we ignore our differences; that would be neither possible nor desirable.  On the contrary, we should, learn from one another by embracing them and selecting the best that each has to offer. This will not happen until we embrace these values.  Without them, partisanship and distrust flourishes, preventing meaningful compromise.  And a Democracy representing over 300 million people cannot survive without its leadership compromising on its political and fiscal policies, and its citizens respecting religious differences.

Unfortunately, for someone whose primary interest is personal gain and not the common good, none of this would be of interest.









No comments:

Post a Comment